Application of 90.803(6): Uncashed Checks- How Business Records Saved the Day
FactsAn injured insured, Manuel Ortiz, assigned his PIP benefits to a chiropractic clinic, which sued United Auto claiming the insurer failed to pay all PIP
Integrity. Experience. Results.
(813) 685-8600
FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Cox Law Office
156 East Bloomingdale Ave.,
Brandon, 33511
Phone: (813) 685 8600
LIKE US ON FACEBOOK
Have a question about Florida law? Cox Law, PLLC provides case law updates covering a wide range of Florida legal topics, including real estate, construction, civil litigation, and more. Feel free to reach out to us at Webquestion@Coxlawplc.com.
Disclaimer: The information provided on this page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or interacting with this content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Cox Law, PLLC. Each legal matter is unique, and the information contained herein may not apply to your specific situation. Do not act or refrain from acting based on any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal counsel. If you have a specific legal concern, please consult a licensed attorney. Contacting us via email does not establish an attorney-client relationship.
FactsAn injured insured, Manuel Ortiz, assigned his PIP benefits to a chiropractic clinic, which sued United Auto claiming the insurer failed to pay all PIP

Clients regularly ask us what the letters next to a person’s name on Sunbiz actually mean. When you pull up a Florida limited liability company
Bookman v. Davidson Summary (136 So. 3d 1276, Fla. 1st DCA 2014) In this Florida probate and legal malpractice case of first impression, the First

Gimeno vs. NCH MD is the Eleventh Circuit’s 2022 answer to a question that had lingered since CIGNA v. Amara: when an employer’s HR department
Facts Z Roofing & Waterproofing, Inc. (plaintiff/appellee) sued Arthur J. Morrison (defendant/appellant) in Miami-Dade County Court (Lower Tribunal No. 20-11804 CC). Before any default was
Analysis: At this point—March 29, 2025—DOGE has prevailed in this Tug of War. The Fourth Circuit’s stay allows it to resume USAID cuts pending the
Case Overview On March 26, 2025, Kevin O’Leary, a Canadian entrepreneur residing in Miami-Dade County, Florida, and known as “Mr. Wonderful” from Shark Tank, initiated
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP v. Elida Maria Garcia Pineda (No. 3D23-0793 (a) Facts The case, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP v. Elida Maria Garcia Pineda (No.
Ian Hendry, et al. v. Ankinyele Adams (Nos. 3D22-2046 & 3D24-903, Lower Tribunal No. 18-20410) (a) Facts The case, Ian Hendry, et al. v. Ankinyele
(a) Facts (b) Issues (c) Holding (d) Rationale (e) Commentary First appellate ruling on retroactive application. link: https://5dca.flcourts.gov/content/download/2443853/opinion/Opinion_2023-3234.pdf
VIEW THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
FactsAn injured insured, Manuel Ortiz, assigned his PIP benefits to a chiropractic clinic, which sued United Auto claiming the insurer failed to pay all PIP

Clients regularly ask us what the letters next to a person’s name on Sunbiz actually mean. When you pull up a Florida limited liability company
Bookman v. Davidson Summary (136 So. 3d 1276, Fla. 1st DCA 2014) In this Florida probate and legal malpractice case of first impression, the First

Gimeno vs. NCH MD is the Eleventh Circuit’s 2022 answer to a question that had lingered since CIGNA v. Amara: when an employer’s HR department
Facts Z Roofing & Waterproofing, Inc. (plaintiff/appellee) sued Arthur J. Morrison (defendant/appellant) in Miami-Dade County Court (Lower Tribunal No. 20-11804 CC). Before any default was
Analysis: At this point—March 29, 2025—DOGE has prevailed in this Tug of War. The Fourth Circuit’s stay allows it to resume USAID cuts pending the
Case Overview On March 26, 2025, Kevin O’Leary, a Canadian entrepreneur residing in Miami-Dade County, Florida, and known as “Mr. Wonderful” from Shark Tank, initiated
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP v. Elida Maria Garcia Pineda (No. 3D23-0793 (a) Facts The case, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP v. Elida Maria Garcia Pineda (No.
Ian Hendry, et al. v. Ankinyele Adams (Nos. 3D22-2046 & 3D24-903, Lower Tribunal No. 18-20410) (a) Facts The case, Ian Hendry, et al. v. Ankinyele
(a) Facts (b) Issues (c) Holding (d) Rationale (e) Commentary First appellate ruling on retroactive application. link: https://5dca.flcourts.gov/content/download/2443853/opinion/Opinion_2023-3234.pdf
Integrity. Experience. Results.
Reach out — we respond quickly.