CONTACT INFORMATION

Cox Law Office
156 East Bloomingdale Ave.,
Brandon, 33511
Phone: (813) 685 8600

Email: Webquestion@Coxlawplc.com

RULE 1.071. CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO STATE STATUTE OR COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL CHARTER, ORDINANCE, OR FRANCHISE; NOTICE BY PARTY

RULE 1.071. CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO STATE STATUTE OR COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL CHARTER, ORDINANCE, OR FRANCHISE; NOTICE BY PARTY

Rule text current through The Florida Bar’s October 1, 2026 edition of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure (amendments through 2026 WL 2603472). Cox Law, PLLC endeavors to update these pages as rule changes are adopted, but be sure to verify the current rule with the official Florida Bar publication or the Florida Supreme Court before relying on it. Page updated October 12, 2026.

A party that files a pleading, written motion, or other document drawing into question the constitutionality of a state statute or a county or municipal charter, ordinance, or franchise must promptly

(a) file a notice of constitutional question stating the question and identifying the document that raises it; and

(b) serve the notice and the pleading, written motion, or other document drawing into question the constitutionality of a state statute or a county or municipal charter, ordinance, or franchise on the Attorney General or the state attorney of the judicial circuit in which the action is pending, by either certified or registered mail.

Service of the notice and pleading, written motion, or other document does not require joinder of the Attorney General or the state attorney as a party to the action.

Committee Notes

2010 Adoption. This rule clarifies that, with respect to challenges to a state statute or municipal charter, ordinance, or franchise, service of the notice does not require joinder of the Attorney General or the state attorney as a party to the action; however, consistent with section 86.091, Florida Statutes, the Florida Attorney General has the discretion to participate and be heard on matters affecting the constitutionality of a statute. See, e.g., Mayo v. National Truck Brokers, Inc., 220 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 1969); State ex rel. Shevin v. Kerwin, 279 So. 2d 836 (Fla. 1973) (Attorney General may choose to participate in appeal even though he was not required to be a party at the trial court). The rule imposes a new requirement that the party challenging the statute, charter, ordinance, or franchise file verification with the court of compliance with section 86.091, Florida Statutes. See form 1.975.

Browse related blog articles to read more or browse blog articles related Fla.R.Civ.P. Rule 1.071

Rule Update: Text verified October 12, 2026 against The Florida Bar’s October 1, 2026 edition of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 1.071 has not been amended since before 2019.

Need help with a Florida civil case? Cox Law, PLLC handles civil litigation in the Tampa Bay area and throughout Florida. Call 813-685-8600 or contact us online to discuss your case.

BROWSE LEGAL TOPICS

Discovery Dispute?

Facing a discovery dispute or tight deadlines under Rule 1.280? Cox Law, PLLC helps Florida litigants navigate proportionality, initial disclosures, and protective orders with precision.

Contact us today to discuss your case and develop a discovery strategy that protects your interests.

(813) 685-8600

Webquestion@Coxlawplc.com

How Can We Help?

Reach out — we respond quickly.

Send an EmailWebquestion@Coxlawplc.com Call Us Now(813) 685-8600 Contact PageFill out our contact form
Scroll to Top