
USAA v. Deehl
A summary may be found below. The original opinion may be sourced here by hyperlink: Read the full opinion — Third District Court of Appeal
Integrity. Experience. Results.
(813) 685-8600
FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Cox Law Office
156 East Bloomingdale Ave.,
Brandon, 33511
Phone: (813) 685 8600
LIKE US ON FACEBOOK
Have a question about Florida law? Cox Law, PLLC provides case law updates covering a wide range of Florida legal topics, including real estate, construction, civil litigation, and more. Feel free to reach out to us at Webquestion@Coxlawplc.com.
Disclaimer: The information provided on this page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or interacting with this content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Cox Law, PLLC. Each legal matter is unique, and the information contained herein may not apply to your specific situation. Do not act or refrain from acting based on any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal counsel. If you have a specific legal concern, please consult a licensed attorney. Contacting us via email does not establish an attorney-client relationship.

A summary may be found below. The original opinion may be sourced here by hyperlink: Read the full opinion — Third District Court of Appeal
Judgment found void as it exceeded the county court’s prescribed jurisdictional limits. The court opinion can be found in here: Read the full opinion —
Listen to this episode on Cox Law Case Briefs: Your browser does not support the audio element. Listen to more episodes on our Podcast page

Case brief of Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981): the Florida Supreme Court’s prejudice-first, four-part test for excluding a witness not disclosed under a pretrial order.

The Court dismissed the petition for writ of prohibition as facially insufficient. Writ of Prohibition: An Actual Emergency Must Exist otherwise suffer the consequences Procedure
A Florida coverage dispute over personal injury protection (PIP) policy language has produced a rare appellate ruling in favor of insurers. In BKD Twenty-One Mgmt.
The court opinion can be found here: Read the full opinion — Fourth District Court of Appeal (PDF)

The court opinion can be found here: Read the full opinion — Fourth District Court of Appeal (PDF)
The court opinion can be found here: https://3dca.flcourts.gov/content/download/859173/opinion/221688_DC03_02012023_100821_i.pdf
The court opinion can be found here: Read the full opinion — Third District Court of Appeal (PDF)
VIEW THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

A summary may be found below. The original opinion may be sourced here by hyperlink: Read the full opinion — Third District Court of Appeal
Judgment found void as it exceeded the county court’s prescribed jurisdictional limits. The court opinion can be found in here: Read the full opinion —
Listen to this episode on Cox Law Case Briefs: Your browser does not support the audio element. Listen to more episodes on our Podcast page

Case brief of Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981): the Florida Supreme Court’s prejudice-first, four-part test for excluding a witness not disclosed under a pretrial order.

The Court dismissed the petition for writ of prohibition as facially insufficient. Writ of Prohibition: An Actual Emergency Must Exist otherwise suffer the consequences Procedure
A Florida coverage dispute over personal injury protection (PIP) policy language has produced a rare appellate ruling in favor of insurers. In BKD Twenty-One Mgmt.
The court opinion can be found here: Read the full opinion — Fourth District Court of Appeal (PDF)

The court opinion can be found here: Read the full opinion — Fourth District Court of Appeal (PDF)
The court opinion can be found here: https://3dca.flcourts.gov/content/download/859173/opinion/221688_DC03_02012023_100821_i.pdf
The court opinion can be found here: Read the full opinion — Third District Court of Appeal (PDF)
Integrity. Experience. Results.
Reach out — we respond quickly.