Multiplier Awarded in Dade Fire Loss Against Insurer
The Citizen’s insured, Pulloquinga, sustained a fire loss. After “contentious” litigation consisting of approximately 27 depositions taken from Jacksonville to Key West and multiple hearings,
Integrity. Experience. Results.
(813) 685-8600
Cox Law Office
156 East Bloomingdale Ave.,
Brandon, 33511
Phone: (813) 685 8600
The Citizen’s insured, Pulloquinga, sustained a fire loss. After “contentious” litigation consisting of approximately 27 depositions taken from Jacksonville to Key West and multiple hearings,
Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company sought certiorari review of an order of the Circuit Court, sitting in its appellate capacity, that affirmed the County Court’s ruling
An action for malicious prosecution possesses the following six elements: (1) an original criminal or civil judicial proceeding against the present plaintiff was commenced or
Plaintiff sued for personal injury damages arising from a motor vehicle accident. Defendant offered $5,001 to settle via a Proposal for Settlement, and Plaintiff rejected
Karen Pannone asserted a shareholder’s derivative action on behalf of Airport Fuel Enterprises, Inc. (“AFE”) and Semoran Liquors, LLC (“Semoran”) against her husband, Charles Letchworth. Pannone propounded
Appellant/Spouse was injured when the raft she was occupying became airborne and ejected the occupants of the raft causing injury to both. Appellant’s raft was being pulled
A Law firm sent a letter to Mortgagors informing them that they were in default and that the Mortgagee had accelerated all sums due. The
Explorer, issued an automobile insurance policy to its policyholder, Cajusma, who was involved in an accident wherein Cajusma and his two passengers sought PIP benefits for alleged injuries
Plaintiff subcontractor sued various Defendants including the owner, general contractor, and a surety arising from the rendition of plumbing services. All Defendants filed Proposals for
The Circuit Court for Marion County entered a summary judgment in favor of the mortgagee. The Defendant Mortgagors appealed to the Fifth District Court of