Integrity. Experience. Results.
(813) 685-8600
FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Cox Law Office
156 East Bloomingdale Ave.,
Brandon, 33511
Phone: (813) 685 8600
LIKE US ON FACEBOOK
Have a question about Florida law? Cox Law, PLLC provides case law updates covering a wide range of Florida legal topics, including real estate, construction, civil litigation, and more. Feel free to reach out to us at webquestion@coxlawplc.com.
Disclaimer: The information provided on this page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or interacting with this content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Cox Law, PLLC. Each legal matter is unique, and the information contained herein may not apply to your specific situation. Do not act or refrain from acting based on any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal counsel. If you have a specific legal concern, please consult a licensed attorney. Contacting us via email does not establish an attorney-client relationship.
Liquidated damages are “specific and precise sums of money immediately apparent from the express terms of the contract itself, or determinable therefrom by mathematical calculation,
A directed verdict is not appropriate in cases where there is conflicting evidence as to causation. Sanders v. ERP Operating Ltd. P’ship, 157 So.3d 273
The insurer appealed from an underlying partial final judgement rendered by the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County in favor of
The Supreme Court ruled that an ERISA plan could not recover settlement funds dissipated on non-traceable items, such as food or travel, from the from
Respondent sought emails between the Petitioner and his counsel pursuant to the crime-fraud exception found in Fla. Stat. § 90.502(4)(a) Respondent sought to demonstrate that
The Citizen’s insured, Pulloquinga, sustained a fire loss. After “contentious” litigation consisting of approximately 27 depositions taken from Jacksonville to Key West and multiple hearings,
Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company sought certiorari review of an order of the Circuit Court, sitting in its appellate capacity, that affirmed the County Court’s ruling
An action for malicious prosecution possesses the following six elements: (1) an original criminal or civil judicial proceeding against the present plaintiff was commenced or
Plaintiff sued for personal injury damages arising from a motor vehicle accident. Defendant offered $5,001 to settle via a Proposal for Settlement, and Plaintiff rejected
Karen Pannone asserted a shareholder’s derivative action on behalf of Airport Fuel Enterprises, Inc. (“AFE”) and Semoran Liquors, LLC (“Semoran”) against her husband, Charles Letchworth. Pannone propounded
VIEW THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Liquidated damages are “specific and precise sums of money immediately apparent from the express terms of the contract itself, or determinable therefrom by mathematical calculation,
A directed verdict is not appropriate in cases where there is conflicting evidence as to causation. Sanders v. ERP Operating Ltd. P’ship, 157 So.3d 273
The insurer appealed from an underlying partial final judgement rendered by the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County in favor of
The Supreme Court ruled that an ERISA plan could not recover settlement funds dissipated on non-traceable items, such as food or travel, from the from
Respondent sought emails between the Petitioner and his counsel pursuant to the crime-fraud exception found in Fla. Stat. § 90.502(4)(a) Respondent sought to demonstrate that
The Citizen’s insured, Pulloquinga, sustained a fire loss. After “contentious” litigation consisting of approximately 27 depositions taken from Jacksonville to Key West and multiple hearings,
Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company sought certiorari review of an order of the Circuit Court, sitting in its appellate capacity, that affirmed the County Court’s ruling
An action for malicious prosecution possesses the following six elements: (1) an original criminal or civil judicial proceeding against the present plaintiff was commenced or
Plaintiff sued for personal injury damages arising from a motor vehicle accident. Defendant offered $5,001 to settle via a Proposal for Settlement, and Plaintiff rejected
Karen Pannone asserted a shareholder’s derivative action on behalf of Airport Fuel Enterprises, Inc. (“AFE”) and Semoran Liquors, LLC (“Semoran”) against her husband, Charles Letchworth. Pannone propounded
Integrity. Experience. Results.
Reach out — we respond quickly.