Echoes of Silence: How an Unspoken Claim Undid Plaintiff Victory
Ian Hendry, et al. v. Ankinyele Adams (Nos. 3D22-2046 & 3D24-903, Lower Tribunal No. 18-20410) (a) Facts The case, Ian Hendry, et al. v. Ankinyele
Integrity. Experience. Results.
(813) 685-8600
FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Cox Law Office
156 East Bloomingdale Ave.,
Brandon, 33511
Phone: (813) 685 8600
LIKE US ON FACEBOOK
Have a question about Florida law? Cox Law, PLLC provides case law updates covering a wide range of Florida legal topics, including real estate, construction, civil litigation, and more. Feel free to reach out to us at Webquestion@Coxlawplc.com.
Disclaimer: The information provided on this page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or interacting with this content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Cox Law, PLLC. Each legal matter is unique, and the information contained herein may not apply to your specific situation. Do not act or refrain from acting based on any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal counsel. If you have a specific legal concern, please consult a licensed attorney. Contacting us via email does not establish an attorney-client relationship.
Ian Hendry, et al. v. Ankinyele Adams (Nos. 3D22-2046 & 3D24-903, Lower Tribunal No. 18-20410) (a) Facts The case, Ian Hendry, et al. v. Ankinyele
(a) Facts (b) Issues (c) Holding (d) Rationale (e) Commentary First appellate ruling on retroactive application. link: https://5dca.flcourts.gov/content/download/2443853/opinion/Opinion_2023-3234.pdf
Liebherr-America, Inc., d/b/a Liebherr USA Co., and Liebherr Cranes, Inc. v. NBIS Construction & Transport Insurance Services (a) Facts What Happened: Liebherr-America sold an LTM

Hurricane Helene struck Florida’s Big Bend region as a category 4 hurricane on September 25, 2024. Milton came ashore near Siesta Key, Florida, as a
The new summary judgment rule: service of at least 40 days before hearing This case serves as a reminder that summary judgment should be filed
Judgment found void as it exceeded the county court’s prescribed jurisdictional limits. The court opinion can be found in here: https://supremecourt.flcourts.gov/content/download/855964/opinion/212272_DC13_12212022_083045_i.pdf
Listen to this episode on Cox Law Case Briefs: Your browser does not support the audio element. Listen to more episodes on our Podcast page

Case brief of Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981): the Florida Supreme Court’s prejudice-first, four-part test for excluding a witness not disclosed under a pretrial order.

The First District Court of Appeal reversed a million-dollar slip-and-fall verdict that had been entered in favor of the Plaintiff, finding that the Plaintiff failed

In a personal injury matter arising from a motor vehicle crash, Defendant served Plaintiff with two proposals for settlement: one for $30,000.00 and a second
VIEW THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Ian Hendry, et al. v. Ankinyele Adams (Nos. 3D22-2046 & 3D24-903, Lower Tribunal No. 18-20410) (a) Facts The case, Ian Hendry, et al. v. Ankinyele
(a) Facts (b) Issues (c) Holding (d) Rationale (e) Commentary First appellate ruling on retroactive application. link: https://5dca.flcourts.gov/content/download/2443853/opinion/Opinion_2023-3234.pdf
Liebherr-America, Inc., d/b/a Liebherr USA Co., and Liebherr Cranes, Inc. v. NBIS Construction & Transport Insurance Services (a) Facts What Happened: Liebherr-America sold an LTM

Hurricane Helene struck Florida’s Big Bend region as a category 4 hurricane on September 25, 2024. Milton came ashore near Siesta Key, Florida, as a
The new summary judgment rule: service of at least 40 days before hearing This case serves as a reminder that summary judgment should be filed
Judgment found void as it exceeded the county court’s prescribed jurisdictional limits. The court opinion can be found in here: https://supremecourt.flcourts.gov/content/download/855964/opinion/212272_DC13_12212022_083045_i.pdf
Listen to this episode on Cox Law Case Briefs: Your browser does not support the audio element. Listen to more episodes on our Podcast page

Case brief of Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981): the Florida Supreme Court’s prejudice-first, four-part test for excluding a witness not disclosed under a pretrial order.

The First District Court of Appeal reversed a million-dollar slip-and-fall verdict that had been entered in favor of the Plaintiff, finding that the Plaintiff failed

In a personal injury matter arising from a motor vehicle crash, Defendant served Plaintiff with two proposals for settlement: one for $30,000.00 and a second
Integrity. Experience. Results.
Reach out — we respond quickly.