Integrity. Experience. Results.
(813) 685-8600
FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Cox Law Office
156 East Bloomingdale Ave.,
Brandon, 33511
Phone: (813) 685 8600
LIKE US ON FACEBOOK
Have a question about Florida law? Cox Law, PLLC provides case law updates covering a wide range of Florida legal topics, including real estate, construction, civil litigation, and more. Feel free to reach out to us at webquestion@coxlawplc.com.
Disclaimer: The information provided on this page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or interacting with this content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Cox Law, PLLC. Each legal matter is unique, and the information contained herein may not apply to your specific situation. Do not act or refrain from acting based on any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal counsel. If you have a specific legal concern, please consult a licensed attorney. Contacting us via email does not establish an attorney-client relationship.
A dispute over CRNs and “60-day cure periods” under Fla. Stat. 624.155(3)(d) was concluded on appeal. https://www.5dca.org/content/download/842098/opinion/211919_DC13_07012022_084459_i.pdf
An employee of an electrical subcontractor was injured when he stepped into an uncovered drain on the construction site. Plaintiff sued for negligence alleging that
The Corporate Deposition Rule The Fourth District Court of Appeal clarified the operation of Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.310(b)(6), which is the rule governing corporate depositions. The Court
The Third District denied certiorari regarding financial information as to the relationship between a non-party insurer and a physician-expert. The matter arose out of a
Holding It is not necessary to establish good cause or excusable neglect to avoid dismissal under Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.070(j). The rule may be found at https://coxlawflorida.com/florida-rules-of-civil-procedure/rule-1-070-process/
The Florida Rules of Civil Procedure on a given subject are intended to be an “integrated whole in which all provisions relating thereto are to
Karen Pannone asserted a shareholder’s derivative action on behalf of Airport Fuel Enterprises, Inc. (“AFE”) and Semoran Liquors, LLC (“Semoran”) against her husband, Charles Letchworth. Pannone propounded
The Circuit Court for Marion County entered a summary judgment in favor of the mortgagee. The Defendant Mortgagors appealed to the Fifth District Court of
Plaintiff sought tort Damages against the Defendant (Personal Representative) arising from a motor vehicle accident that occurred in St. John’s County, Florida. The Defendant served
Plaintiff sued for personal injury damages arising from a motor vehicle accident. Defendant offered $5,001 to settle via a Proposal for Settlement, and Plaintiff rejected
VIEW THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
A dispute over CRNs and “60-day cure periods” under Fla. Stat. 624.155(3)(d) was concluded on appeal. https://www.5dca.org/content/download/842098/opinion/211919_DC13_07012022_084459_i.pdf
An employee of an electrical subcontractor was injured when he stepped into an uncovered drain on the construction site. Plaintiff sued for negligence alleging that
The Corporate Deposition Rule The Fourth District Court of Appeal clarified the operation of Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.310(b)(6), which is the rule governing corporate depositions. The Court
The Third District denied certiorari regarding financial information as to the relationship between a non-party insurer and a physician-expert. The matter arose out of a
Holding It is not necessary to establish good cause or excusable neglect to avoid dismissal under Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.070(j). The rule may be found at https://coxlawflorida.com/florida-rules-of-civil-procedure/rule-1-070-process/
The Florida Rules of Civil Procedure on a given subject are intended to be an “integrated whole in which all provisions relating thereto are to
Karen Pannone asserted a shareholder’s derivative action on behalf of Airport Fuel Enterprises, Inc. (“AFE”) and Semoran Liquors, LLC (“Semoran”) against her husband, Charles Letchworth. Pannone propounded
The Circuit Court for Marion County entered a summary judgment in favor of the mortgagee. The Defendant Mortgagors appealed to the Fifth District Court of
Plaintiff sought tort Damages against the Defendant (Personal Representative) arising from a motor vehicle accident that occurred in St. John’s County, Florida. The Defendant served
Plaintiff sued for personal injury damages arising from a motor vehicle accident. Defendant offered $5,001 to settle via a Proposal for Settlement, and Plaintiff rejected
Integrity. Experience. Results.
Reach out — we respond quickly.